The Press Note 3 of 2020 is an important part of India’s foreign direct investment (FDI) policy concerning national security and geopolitical relations. The note restricts FDI from countries that share a land border with India, such as China and Bangladesh. Under this directive, investments from these countries require government approval, regardless of the FDI cap in the concerned sector. This step is seen as a measure to prevent opportunistic takeovers or acquisitions of Indian companies during times of economic vulnerability due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. It highlights the government’s careful approach to balancing economic growth with national security concerns. Investors from neighbouring countries who plan to set up a subsidiary company or an independent PLC or a JV in India must have a clear understanding of Press Note 3, which is necessary for navigating the FDI process in India.
The Indian Government made significant changes to its Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These changes, outlined in Press Note No-3, aimed to prevent opportunistic takeovers or acquisitions of Indian companies during the pandemic-induced economic vulnerability. Previously, non-resident entities were allowed to invest in India, subject to the FDI policy, except for prohibited sectors. However, entities from Bangladesh and Pakistan had specific restrictions and were required to follow the Government route for investments.
The Press Note 3 did not clarify the applicability of the restrictions placed under it concerning Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, for which an official clarification still needs to be issued. However, we are of the view that the Press note applies to Hong Kong and Macau as these are the Special Administrative Regions of the People’s Republic of China. India has consistently recognised Taiwan as an independent government. Hence, the restrictions of PN-3 do not apply to foreign direct investments originating from Taiwan. Read news reports of the Economic Times at https://ecoti.in/YSDjbY53
The term “Beneficial Ownership” is not explicitly defined in Press Note 3 or the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). Instead, the Companies Act and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) have their definitions. As a result, it has been unclear which definition of Beneficial Ownership should be used to interpret the restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) from neighbouring countries that share a land border with India. While the government has yet to provide an official clarification on this matter, we believe that the definition provided under the PMLA should be used.
India's Press Note 3 of 2020 restricts FDI from China and other neighbouring countries sharing a land border with India, requiring government approval for investments from these countries. The move aims to prevent opportunistic takeovers or acquisitions of Indian companies during times of economic vulnerability while balancing economic growth with national security concerns. The concept of beneficial ownership needs to be defined, creating uncertainty for investors navigating India's complex FDI landscape amidst geopolitical complexities.